Steve Slott on Fluoride debate: Arguments Aga… Stuart Mathieson on Fluoride debate Stuart Mathieson on Fluoride debate Jo Lane on Fluoride debate: Arguments Aga… Steve Slott on Fluoride debate: Arguments Aga… Cedric Katesby on Fluoride debate: Arguments Aga… Stuart Mathieson on Fluoride debate chris on Fluoride debate: Arguments Aga… Richard Christie on Census 2013 – religious… ChristopherAtkinson on Fluoride debate Steve Slott on Fluoride debate: Arguments Aga… Steve Slott on Fluoride debate: Arguments Aga… ChristopherAtkinson on Census 2013 – religious… Stuart Mathieson on Fluoride debate: Arguments Aga… Luke Oldfield on Fluoride debate: Arguments Aga…
- Fluoride debate: Arguments Against Fluoridation Thread. Part 5. Paul
- Census 2013 – religious diversity
- The fluoride debate: Response to Paul’s 6th article.
- Testing the God theory
- Fluoridation debate: Against Fluoridation Thread. Part 6.
- November ’13 – NZ blogs sitemeter ranking
- ‘The particle at the end of the universe’ wins Winton Prize
- Fluoridation debate: Why I support fluoridation – 2nd reply to Connett
- Psychics have it easy these days
- Fluoride Debate: Why I support fluoridation – 2nd response from Connett
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Articles and comments search
Add to Favourites
Search Results for: evolution
Victor Stenger has a short, but important, blog post in the Huffington Post. Appropriately (because it’s about evolutionary science) dated February 12 – Darwin Day, 204th anniversary of Charles Darwin’s birth. Stenger’s article, No Belief Gap, considers Gallup Poll data … Continue reading
Controversy around Rebecca Watson’s recent talk on pop-psychology and media presentation of evolutionary psychology is probably having a least one positive side effect (see Sceptical arrogance and evolutionary psychology and Sceptical humility and peer review in science). There’s now more discussion on … Continue reading
“We should be skeptical of all points of view, including those of the skeptics.”* I came across the quote above in Michael Shermer’s article remembering Paul Kurtz, one of the founders of the modern US skeptical movement (see “Paul Kurtz … Continue reading
How reliable do you think your cognitive facilities are? Your eyes, ears, etc? Your brain, memory and mental processes? According to philosopher of religion Alvin Plantinga, not very good. He asserts any belief you form using these facilities is as … Continue reading
This post is the last in a series on human morality (see, Objective or subjective laws and lawgivers, Subjective morality – not what it seems? and Drifting moral values). These are not meant as an academic treatment of the subject (as one commenter (OS) … Continue reading
Darwin Day is this weekend so I thought I should do a couple of relevant posts. Here I want to comment on a popular reaction to evolutionary science by mainstream Christians. I am referring to the regular church-goer or adherent … Continue reading
Books are ideal Christmas presents. And as I am spending some time dealing with family business I thought reposting some of my past book reviews over the next few days could be useful am repeating some of my past book … Continue reading
Creationists have far less influence in New Zealand than they do in the US. Still, quite a large proportion of Christians here do not accept evolutionary science. So, I imagine, their wish to undermine the teaching of evolutionary science sometimes … Continue reading