Intelligent design and depression

I am currently reading Michael Behe’s book Darwin’s Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution,one of the main books advocating “intelligent design” (ID). It’s quite different to most other science books. Whereas I normally enjoy science books and find them very uplifting, even inspirational, I am finding this one depressing.

It’s not because I disagree with Behe’s conclusions – after all one doesn’t have to accept concepts or speculations to find their discussion stimulating. Consider some of the current scientific speculation around string theory, multiple universes, etc. No, it’s really that the whole style of this book is not normal for science. Rather than being inspirational or enthusiastic it comes across as defeatist and depressing. Rather than encouraging the search for knowledge and understanding it repeatedly encourages the reader to see nature as too complicated to understand. It discounts the idea that we could ever find out how living systems work, how they arose or how life itself could have originated. This book really doesn’t offer anything positive to be enthusiastic about.

The fear of complexity

Behe’s enthusiasm for the subject really stops at his claim that things like the blood coagulation process or bacteria flagella are just too “staggeringly complex” too understand. He claims they have a “choking complexity’. It’s one thing to claim complexity and to acknowledge a lack of explanation but Behe goes one step further by claiming the problems are too hard, or even impossible, for science to solve. He argues instead for incorporation of “supernatural” explanations into science.

This approach is really condensed into Behe’s concept of “irreducible complexity.” He sees bacterial flagella, for example, as “staggeringly complex” and because he cannot see how they could evolve naturally he then declares that they are too complex to have evolved. He declares them to be “irreducibly complex.” In another example he states: “Vesicular transport is mind bogglingly complex …… an analysis shows that vesicular transport is irreducibly complex.” What a defeatist attitude!

In effect he is saying “this problem is too hard to solve – lets adopt a supernatural explanation.” That’s depressing. I am more used to the scientific attitude which says: “This is a difficult problem – let’s get to work!”

This book is depressing because it doesn’t offer any positive hope of understanding. It is devoted to attacking current knowledge, describing areas where he considers knowledge to be inadequate, but not suggesting any hypotheses for work to clear up the gaps.

ID “research”

Mind you, this is the declared strategy of the Wedge activists who promote ID. Phillip Johnson himself admits that ID does not yet have a viable theory, or any credible research. He claims that will come later. But first the ID movement must destroy “Darwinism” (their code term for modern evolutionary theory). Once evolutionary science has been destroyed the ID movement will have space to to do the work required to produce their own theories! Consequently all the efforts of the ID movement are devoted to this task of destruction. All their writings and media productions are aimed at discrediting evolutionary science.

Current ID “research” amounts to this criticism and carping from the outside. There is no work in laboratories or scientific institutes. They even have a name for this strange style of endeavor – reinterpretation research. This is aimed purely at interpreting past and current published science according to the “design paradigm” – to provide alternative supernatural explanations.

No effort goes into developing alternative scientific hypotheses, carrying out genuine scientific research, and developing a genuine scientific ID theory.

Thats depressing!

Related Articles:
Scientific dissent from . . . science?
Who are the “dissenters from Darwinism”?
Dissenters from Darwinism in context
Religious opposition to “intelligent design”
Intelligent design and the threat to Christianity
Intelligent design and scientific method
Intelligent design – a war on science
New Zealand supports evolution
Intelligent design at the shopping mall
Isaac Newton and intelligent design
Intelligent design/creationism I: What is scientific knowledge?
Intelligent design/creationism II: Is it scientific?
Intelligent design/creationism III: The religious agenda
Intelligent design/creationism IV: The religion – science conflict
Intelligent design/creationism: Postscript

5 responses to “Intelligent design and depression

  1. Ken you say: “Rather than encouraging the search for knowledge and understanding it repeatedly encourages the reader to see nature as too complicated to understand.”

    This is the definition of religion and, of course, Intelligent Design. And this is why it has absolutely no place in science classes or anywhere near them.




    The Quest for Right, a series of 7 textbooks created for the public schools, represents the ultimate marriage between an in-depth knowledge of biblical phenomena and natural and physical sciences. The several volumes have accomplished that which, heretofore, was deemed impossible: to level the playing field between those who desire a return to physical science in the classroom and those who embrace the theory of evolution. The Quest for Right turns the tide by providing an authoritative and enlightening scientific explanation of natural phenomena which will ultimately dethrone the unprofitable Darwinian view.

    The backbone of Darwinism is not biological evolution per se, but electronic interpretation, the tenet that all physical, chemical, and biological processes result from a change in the electron structure of the atom which, in turn, may be deciphered through the orderly application of mathematics, as outlined in quantum mechanics. A few of the supporting theories are: degrading stars, neutron stars, black holes, extraterrestrial water, antimatter, the absolute dating systems, and the big bang, the explosion of a singularity infinitely smaller than the dot of an “i” from which space, time, and the massive stellar bodies supposedly sprang into being.

    The philosophy rejects any divine intervention. Therefore, let the philosophy of Darwinism be judged on these specifics: electron interpretation and quantum mechanics. Conversely, the view that God is both responsible for and rules all the phenomena of the universe will stand or fall when the facts are applied. The view will not hinge on faith alone, but will be tested by the weightier principle of verifiable truths – the new discipline.

    The Quest for Right is not only better at explaining natural phenomena, but also may be verified through testing. As a consequence, the material in the several volumes will not violate the so-called constitutional separation of church and state. Physical science, the old science of cause and effect, will have a long-term sustainability, replacing irresponsible doctrines based on whim. Teachers and students will rejoice in the simplicity of earthly phenomena when entertained by the new discipline.

    The Quest for Right is not only an academic resource designed for the public schools, but also contains a wealth of information on pertinent subjects that seminarians need to know to be effective: geology, biology, geography, astronomy, chemistry, paleontology, and in-depth Biblical studies. The nuggets from the pages of Biblical history alone will give seminarians literally hundreds of fresh ideas for sermons and teachings. The ministry resources contained in The Quest for Right serve as invaluable aids that will enrich graduates beyond their highest expectations.

    You will not want to miss the adventure of a lifetime which awaits you in Volume 1 of The Quest for Right.

    Visit the official website for additional information and to purchase a copy:

    “A book that will change the world.” – Wayne Lin, Editor, Tate Publishing LLC


  3. Hi Ken,

    I just wanted to drop a note to say hi and keep up the good work. I discovered you after you you weighed in on the side of science in a thread at Ian Wishart’s blog and have since been reading back thorough your excellent posts.

    But now Mr C. David Parsons, biblical scholar and scientist extraordinaire, has completely blown my mind, his books appear to be the time cube of science education. The only bit of those pages that make sense (in a strictly semantic sense) to me are the ones that are attacking Avogadro and his number.


  4. Hi David – good to make contact.
    My understanding of Parsons is that he is a creationists promoting his book. The same comment is appearing on many Blogs. I guess he just sends it to anything with ID in its title.


  5. Pingback: Rachel’s Musings » ID on Trial: A Show on Nova

Leave a Reply: please be polite to other commenters & no ad hominems.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s