Blaming the victim

galileo_31This year is the International Year of Astronomy and, in part, marks the 400th anniversary of Galileo Galilei’s first use of telescopes for astronomic observation. And we can’t remember Galileo without also remembering how he was treated by the Church.

I find it interesting, however, that there seems to be a fashion amongst some Christian apologists, and even some others, to blame Galileo for this experience. In other words to blame the victim.

The basic facts are well known. The Catholic Church had banned the advocacy of heliocentrism, the idea that the earth orbited the sun. They declared that it was contrary to the literal meaning of scripture. Despite Galileo’s forced recantation of these ideas he lived out the rest of his life under house arrest on orders of the Roman Inquisition.

A classic example of dogmatism preventing honest scientific investigation.

Reality often more complex

Of course the details of these situations are always more complex and each party to a conflict will have their own political and social agendas. And it is easy to find fault with the behaviour of victims.

And this is what is happening here with this current apologist fashion. The whole incident is now being presented by some as if the Church was somehow blameless. Galileo has been accused of political manipulation. He was “opposed by the “scientific establishment” . . .  and it is they who used the church to get Galileo condemned. In essence, the Galileo affair was not church versus science, but mostly “science-politicized” on both the sides.” (see Bias, Prejudice, and Cheating in Science!!). So science was at fault and the Church was innocent!

Others claim Galileo’s crime was to suggest that science could help us understand the true facts of nature. It would have been OK for him to propose heliocentrism as a convenient instrumentalist was of describing the phenomena but only the Church was capable of revealing the underlying truth. Again, the Church was blameless and Galileo brought it on himself. This is suggested in one of  William Lane Craig‘s podcasts. See also the podcast by by Conor Cunningham – A plague on both houses – mp3).

Excusing Stalin and Mao

This reminds me of the apologists for Stalin and Mao Zedong who used to justify the persecution of individuals by their regimes. I remember New Zealand liberals and leftists (including many Christians) condemning China’s “Capitalist Roaders” and ignoring or excusing the Maoist repression of the “Cultural Revolution” of the 1960s and 1970s.  And I am sure Stalin’s supporters were able to find (or invent) behavioural faults in the victims of that regime during the 1930s and 1940s. Supporters of those regimes were skilful in blaming the victim, finding fault with their behaviour, and meanwhile ignoring completely the repressive and bloodthirsty behaviour of those tyrants and their political regimes.

The Church’s guilt

It seems to me inhuman that these Christian apologists should blame Galileo and science for his victimisation. One has only to look at the Church statement on Galileo to see who was really at fault:

“You have rendered yourself vehemently suspect of heresy, namely of having held and believed a doctrine which is false and contrary to the Sacred and Divine Scriptures, that the Sun is the center of the world and does not move from east to west, and that the Earth moves and is not the center of the world; and that one may hold and defend as probable an opinion after it has been declared and defined contrary to Holy Scripture.”

Let’s not forget that the Church took 200 years to remove Galileo’s major work on the solar system, Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems from the Roman Catholic index of prohibited books.  And it didn’t lift Galileo’s conviction for heresy until 1992!

Blaming the victim

I see a similarity in the behaviour of the Church to Galileo and the political repression of Stalin and Mao. To me the apologetic excusing of the church is equivalent to blaming Solzhenitsyn for his exile from the USSR. (After all, there is a lot in Solzhenitsyn’s behaviour which was wrong). Or to blaming Andrei Sakharov for his internal exile. Or blaming Liu Shaoqi for his death.

It’s equivalent to blaming all those individuals who murdered by Stalin and his henchmen in Stalin’s Soviet Union.

Don’t these apologists have any conscience?


Similar articles

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to Ma.gnoliaAdd to TechnoratiAdd to FurlAdd to Newsvine

Leave a Reply: please be polite to other commenters & no ad hominems.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s