Fluoridation articles

Some of the anti-fluoridation propaganda can get pretty extreme. Even the less extreme material is often misleading.

I have collected below links to my articles where I debunk these myths and expose the misinformation.

For a shorter list organised by category go to Fluoridation.

• Fluoridation and child IQ – the problem of counting chickens before they hatch October 21, 2021
• Anti-fluoridation group tells porkies about NZ fluoridation review June 18, 2021
• Opponents of fluoridation all at sea with new legislation June 15, 2021
• Update of NZ fluoridation review timely and useful June 5, 2021
• Fluoridation contribution to heavy metals in drinking water is too low to measure May 27, 2021
• Hip fractures in the elderly and fluoride – contradictory evidence April 26, 2021
• An open letter to Paul Connet and the anti-fluoride movement March 23, 2021
• Data dredging, p-hacking and motivated discussion in anti-fluoride paper February 26, 2021
• Embarrassing knock-back of second draft review of possible cognitive health effects of fluoride February 11, 2021
• The promotion of weak statistical relationships in science February 4, 2021
• Can we trust science? February 2, 2021
• I don’t “believe” in science – and neither should you January 29, 2021
• Science is often wrong – be critical December 6, 2020
• Even studies from endemic fluorosis areas show fluoride is not harmful at levels used in fluoridation July 29, 2020
• Canadian studies confirm findings of Broadbent et al (2015) – fluoridation has no effect on child IQ July 20, 2020
• Child IQ in countries with endemic fluorosis imply fluoridation is safe. July 19, 2020
• Anti-fluoride 65 brain-fluoride studies not evidence against fluoridation July 16, 2020
• Another study used by anti-fluoride activists actually shows community water fluoridation OK June 4, 2020
• When scientists get political: Lead fluoride-IQ researcher launches emotional attack on her scientific critics May 25, 2020
• New study touted by anti-fluoridation campaigners actually indicates fluoridation is safe May 20, 2020

• No relationship of bone cancer to fluoridation – another new study the anti-fluoride brigade will attempt to ignore May 14, 2020
• New review finds fluoride is not a developmental neurotoxicant at exposure levels relevant to fluoridation May 11, 2020
• Anti-fluoride campaigners still rely on irrelevant studies April 23, 2020
• Author confirms anti-fluoridation activist misrepresentation of her work April 22, 2020
• Anti-fluoridation propaganda now relies on only four studies. 6: Incestuous relationship of these studies April 10, 2020
• Anti-fluoridation propaganda now relies on only four studies. 5: Don’t censor yourself April 9, 2020
• Anti-fluoridation propaganda now relies on only four studies. 4: Till et al (2020) April 8, 2020
• Anti-fluoridation propaganda now relies on only four studies. 3: Riddell et al (2019) April 7, 2020
• Anti-fluoridation propaganda now relies on only four studies. 2: Green et al (2019) April 6, 2020
• Anti-fluoridation propaganda now relies on only four studies. 1: Bashash et al (2018) April 5, 2020
• No; a new study from Ethiopia does not indicate fluoridation is bad for your bones March 16, 2020
• Anti-fluoridationists put faith in new “strong” studies to provide evidence missing in draft NTP review March 12, 2020
• Industry-funded translation can introduce bias in selection of studies for scientific review March 9, 2020
• Another embarrassment for anti-fluoride campaigners as neurotoxic claim found not to be justified March 7, 2020
• Beware of scientific paper abstracts – read the full text to avoid being fooled February 5, 2020
• Fluoridation and sex steroid hormones – or the mouse that roared January 27, 2020
• What are the recent fluoride-IQ studies really saying about community water fluoridation? January 23, 2020
• Fluoridation science and political advocacy – who is fooling who? December 19, 2019
• Scientific integrity & fluoridation – Dr Ghali responds December 18, 2019
• Sleep disorders and fluoride: dredging data to confirm a bias December 16, 2019

• Some fluoride-IQ researchers seem to be taking in each other’s laundry December 15, 2019
• Statistical manipulation to get publishable results December 10, 2019
• Scientific integrity requires critical investigation – not blind acceptance December 5, 2019
• Anti-fluoride propagandists appear not to read the articles they promote November 26, 2019
• The anti-fluoride brigade won’t be erecting billboards about this study November 10, 2019
• ADHD and fluoride – wishful thinking supported by statistical manipulation? October 31, 2019
• Experts complain to funding body about quality of fluoride-IQ research October 24, 2019
• What do these mother-child studies really say about fluoridation? October 15, 2019
• Biostatistical problems with the Canadian fluoride/IQ study September 25, 2019
• Fluoridation – A new fight against scientific misinformation September 23, 2019
• An evidence-based discussion of the Canadian fluoride/IQ study September 11, 2019
• More expert comments on the Canadian fluoride-IQ paper September 8, 2019
• Politics of science – making a silk purse out of a sow’s ear September 5, 2019
• If at first you don’t succeed . . . statistical manipulation might help August 22, 2019
• Anti-fluoride activists misrepresent a new kidney/liver study August 14, 2019
• Preempting the annual misrepresentation of NZ dental health data by anti-fluoride activists January 23, 2019
• Fluoridation: Another study shows stopping fluoridation bad for child tooth decay December 20, 2018
• Protection of teeth by fluoride confirmed – yet again November 26, 2018
• Fluoridation and ADHD: A new round of statistical straw clutching October 18, 2018
• A more convincing take on prenatal maternal dietary effects on child IQ September 17, 2018

• Fluoridation: “debating” the science? September 11, 2018
• Anti-fluoride campaigners exhaust their legal channels with another loss June 28, 2018
• Anti-fluoridation activists buy scientific credibility using a predatory publisher May 30, 2018
• Not just another rat study May 9, 2018
• Anti-fluoridationist Paul Connett misrepresents NZ data April 11, 2018
• Anti-fluoridationists rejection of IQ studies in fluoridated area. April 4, 2018
• A conference paper on the maternal prenatal urinary fluoride/child IQ study has problems March 30, 2018
• The 52 IQ studies used by anti-fluoride campaigners March 28, 2018
• Why is it so difficult to get an open discussion on fluoridation? March 21, 2018
• Mary Byrne’s criticism is misplaced and avoids the real issues March 14, 2018
• Anti-fluoride group coordinator responds to my article March 13, 2018
• Paul Connett’s misrepresentation of maternal F exposure study debunked March 5, 2018
• Anti-fluoride activist commits “Death by PowerPoint” February 28, 2018
• Paul Connett “updates” NZ MPs about fluoride? February 22, 2018
• Anti-fluoride activists misrepresent another thyroid study February 14, 2018
• Yet another fluoride-IQ study January 31, 2018
• Anti-fluoridationists misrepresent New Zealand dental data – an annual event December 17, 2017
• Fluoridation means money in the pocket December 7, 2017
• Anti-fluoridation campaigners often use statistical significance to confirm bias December 5, 2017
• Anti-fluoride “expert” finds the real reason oral health has improved – and it’s not fluoride November 15, 2017

• New fluoride debate falters October 25, 2017
• Flaw and porkie in anti-fluoride report claiming a flaw in Canadian study October 19, 2017
• Do we need a new fluoride debate? October 12, 2017
• Endemic fluorosis and its health effects September 28, 2017
• Maternal urinary fluoride/IQ study – an update September 24, 2017
• Fluoride, pregnancy and the IQ of offspring September 21, 2017
• Facts about fluorosis – not a worry in New Zealand September 19, 2017
• What’s with the anti-fluoridationist promotion of dental health programmes? September 11, 2017
• Fluoridation not associated with ADHD – a myth put to rest August 30, 2017
• Are fluoride researchers sacked for their findings? August 10, 2017
• Fluoridation and cancer August 7, 2017
• Local anti-fluoride activists tell porkies yet again August 3, 2017
• Fluoridation: Open letter to Democrats for Social Credit June 15, 2017
• Fluoridation: What’s happening with the New Zealand legislation? June 12, 2017
• Anti-fluoridationists commonly misrepresent Ministry of Health data May 24, 2017
• ChildSmile – a complement, not an alternative, to fluoridation May 18, 2017
• Fluoridation helps protect adult teeth as well as children’s May 16, 2017
• Fluoridation: the truth about heavy metal contamination May 11, 2017
• Bottle fed infants: fluoridated water not a problem May 3, 2017
• Citing scientific studies and the arrogance of ignorance April 27, 2017

• Debating science April 24, 2017
• No, fluoridation is not associated with leading causes of death April 13, 2017
• Anti-fluoridationists exploit infant deaths by fiddling statistics April 9, 2017
• Bottle fed infants: fluoridated water not a problem. April 2, 2017
• Another anti-fluoridation whopper March 30, 2017
• Fluoride, coffee and activist confusion March 23, 2017
• Anti-fluoride authors indulge in data manipulation and statistical porkies March 12, 2017
• EPA comprehensively debunks anti-fluoride claims of a fluoride-IQ effect February 26, 2017
• Anti-fluoridationists go to Supreme Court – who is paying for this? February 22, 2017
• Debunking a “classic” fluoride-IQ paper by leading anti-fluoride propagandists February 21, 2017
• Non-fluoridated Christchurch does not have better teeth than fluoridated Auckland February 7, 2017
• Debunking anti-fluoridationist’s remaining 12 reasons for opposing fluoridation January 30, 2017
• New research confirms adults benefit from community water fluoridation as well as children January 23, 2017
• Premature births a factor in cognitive deficits observed in areas of endemic fluorosis? January 19, 2017
• More nails in the coffin of the anti-fluoridation myths around IQ and hypothyroidism January 15, 2017
• Water fluoridation – what to expect in the near future January 12, 2017
• Fluoridation: New scientific review of fluoride and oral health January 10, 2017
• Anti-fluoride IQ claims are false January 3, 2017
• Large Swedish study finds no effect of fluoride on IQ December 27, 2016
• Fluoridation: New research confirms it is cost effective – yet again December 13, 2016

• Fluoridation: members of parliament call from submissions from scientific and health experts December 8, 2016
• Leader of flawed fluoridation study gets money for another go November 28, 2016
• Anti-fluoride claims often not relevant to New Zealand November 6, 2016
• Fluoridation not associated with hip fracture, heart attacks of osteosarcoma – new study October 17, 2016
• Anti-fluoridation activist Paul Connett has a senior moment about our debate October 12, 2016
• Shyness of anti-fluoride election candidates October 4, 2016
• Flogging a dead horse – anti-fluoridationists lose in court again September 28, 2016
• Fluoridation & democracy: Open letter to DHB candidate Andrew Buckley September 18, 2016
• Dissecting pseudoscientific and political propaganda September 8, 2016
• An anti-fluoride trick: Impressing the naive with citations August 29, 2016
• Does community water fluoridation reduce diabetes prevalence? August 24, 2016
• “Filtering” out fluoride August 21, 2016
• Fluoridation – freedom of choice August 14, 2016
• Is water fluoridation better than salt fluoridation? August 9, 2016
• Dental health – it’s not all about fluoride July 26, 2016
• Misrepresenting fluoride science – an open letter to Paul Connett July 14, 2016
• Chemophobic scaremongering: Much ado about absolutely nothing June 12, 2016
• Fluoridation: News media should check press releases from anti-fluoridationists June 7, 2016
• New review shows clear economic benefits from community water fluoridation May 31, 2016
• Debating fluoridation and tyranny – Tom O’Connor responds May 30, 2016

• Attempting a tyranny of the minority on fluoridation May 29, 2016
• Fluoridation: One small step sideways? May 25, 2016
• New research confirms water fluoridation does not cause bone cancers May 23, 2016
• Public discussion of science can be toxic May 19, 2016
• Fluoridation cessation studies reviewed – overall increase in tooth decay noted May 15, 2016
• “Do the math” – a bit like “Do the research!” May 8, 2016
• Korean community water fluoridation supported by new evidence April 28, 2016
• Anti-fluoride campaigners cherry-pick irrelevant overseas research but can’t find relevant New Zealand research April 24, 2016
• Cochrane fluoridation review described as “empty” April 21, 2016
• Anti-fluoridationists misrepresent new dental data for New Zealand children April 19, 2016
• A challenge to anti-fluoridationers to justify their misrepresentation of New Zealand research April 15, 2016
• Fluoridation decisions to be made by District Health Boards April 12, 2016
• Anti-fluoridationists now scaremonger about silica in your drinking water April 10, 2016
• Reversed responsibility and the burden of proof April 7, 2016
• Anti-fluoridation cherry-pickers at it again April 5, 2016
• Fluoridation: My podcast with with Howard Farran March 31, 2016
• The toxicity of chemophobia March 20, 2016
• Anti-fluoridation campaigner, Stan Litras, misrepresents WHO March 16, 2016
• Hiding behind “experts” March 13, 2016
• A Chinese study the anti-fluoridation crowd won’t be citing March 8, 2016

• Searching articles on fluoride March 3, 2016
• Anti-fluoridationist’s flawed attacks on Calgary study February 27, 2016
• Fluoridation: Whakatane teaches us something we should already know February 11, 2016
• Chemistry – “to dupe, to cheat?” February 10, 2016
• Once more on the IQ and fluoride myth – why ignore other factors? February 3, 2016
• Fluoridation: Whakatane District Council makes the Hamilton mistake January 31, 2016
• New study finds community water fluoridation still cost effective January 28, 2016
• “Crusade Against Multiple Regression Analysis” – don’t throw baby out with bathwater January 27, 2016
• Fluoridation: Some simple chemistry January 24, 2016
• Iron and fluoride in human milk January 18, 2016
• The Harvard study and the Lancet paper January 13, 2016
• Cultural and ideological bias in scientific literature reviews January 12, 2016
• Yet another misrepresentation of a dental health study January 4, 2016
• Community water fluoridation still cost-effective December 23, 2015
• Democracy and expert advice on scientific issues December 22, 2015
• Fluoride and IQ – another study coming up December 17, 2015
• Another defeat for anti-fluoridation claims about arsenic December 3, 2015
• Anti-fluoride hypothyroidism paper slammed yet again November 15, 2015
• Cyberchondria and similar “illnesses” November 11, 2015
• Onehunga and the “fluoride-free” myth November 9, 2015

• Thames voters decisively support fluoridation November 5, 2015
• The quackery of anti-fluoride internet trolls October 27, 2015
• Combatting anti-fluoride Gish gallopers October 19, 2015
• Responding to Tracey Brown on fluoridation October 13, 2015
• “The ugly truth” – Tracey Brown ticks me off October 13, 2015
• The ugly truth about critics of “the ugly truth” in science October 8, 2015
• Fluoride: More scaremongering using drug warnings September 30, 2015
• Cochrane responds to misrepresentation of their fluoridation review September 24, 2015
• ChildSmile dental health – its pros and cons September 23, 2015
• Fluoridation: Freedom of choice – and responsibility September 14, 2015
• My talk to the Reason & Science Society – an invite September 13, 2015
• Why the internet annoys chemists September 10, 2015
• In the end, it came down to the science in Denver August 27, 2015
• Subverting democratic consultation on the fluoride issue August 26, 2015
• Alternative reality of anti-fluoride “science” August 20, 2015
• Anti-fluoride propagandists get creative with statistics August 16, 2015
• Fluoridation: Connett’s criticism of New Zealand research debunked August 13, 2015
• Fluoridation: Connett’s naive use of WHO data debunked August 12, 2015
• Connett misrepresents the fluoride and IQ data yet again August 5, 2015
• Fluoridation: Newsweek science journalism bottoms out August 3, 2015

• Fluoridation: “Sciencey” sounding claims ruled unacceptable July 29, 2015
• Comparing the Cochrane and NZ Fluoridation Reviews July 26, 2015
• Scaremongering and chemophobia July 21, 2015
• Fluoridation: Beliefs about safety and benefits July 8, 2015
• Cochrane fluoridation review. III: Misleading section on dental fluorosis July 3, 2015
• Cochrane fluoridation review. II: “Biased” and poor quality research? June 30, 2015
• Cochrane fluoridation review. I: Most research ignored June 29, 2015
• Misrepresentation of the new Cochrane fluoridation review June 20, 2015
• Misrepresenting the York fluoride review June 16, 2015
• Fluoridation: Misrepresenting the “saliva theory” June 14, 2015
• Fluoridation and horses – another myth June 10, 2015
• Fake weight-loss study example of wider problem June 4, 2015
• Calcium fluoride and the “soft” water anti-fluoridation myth June 3, 2015
• Connett & Hirzy do a shonky risk assesment for fluoride May 27, 2015
• Don’t expect to see chemical safety data sheets in restaurants May 21, 2015
• Water fluoridation effective – new study May 11, 2015
• Follow the money? May 8, 2015
• The distrust of science – a task for science communication May 6, 2015
• Poor peer review – and its consequences April 27, 2015
• Connett fiddles the data on fluoride April 23, 2015

• ADHD link to fluoridation claim undermined again April 21, 2015
• Commercial and ideological support of anti-fluoride activity April 19, 2015
• Is comfirmation bias essential to anti-fluoride “research?” April 13, 2015
• IQ not influenced by water fluoridation April 8, 2015
• Making sense of scientific research April 6, 2015
• Poor peer-review – a case study March 29, 2015
• ADHD linked to elevation not fluoridation March 22, 2015
• More poor-quality research promoted by anti-fluoride activists March 17, 2015
• Free download – “Severe dental fluorosis and cognitive deficits” March 14, 2015
• Are submissions on fluoridation worth it? March 11, 2015
• Social media and science – the problems and the challenge March 9, 2015
• Open letter to Lisa Hansen on NZ Fluoridation Review March 3, 2015
• Paper claiming water fluoridation linked to hypothyroidism slammed by experts February 25, 2015
• NZ Fluoridation review – Response to Micklen February 18, 2015
• NZ Fluoridation review – HS Micklen responds to critique February 17, 2015
• Did business interests interfere with Hamilton’s fluoride tribunal process? February 15, 2015
• Download report analysing anti-fluoride attacks on NZ Fluoridation Review February 9, 2015
• Social health policies, freedom of choice and responsibility February 5, 2015
• Hypocrisy January 27, 2015
• Severe dental fluorosis and cognitive deficits – now peer reviewed January 18, 2015

• Those evil chemicals January 15, 2015
• “Internet and social media misinform thousands daily” January 14, 2015
• Fluoride Free NZ report disingenuous – conclusion January 6, 2015
• Special pleading by Philippe Grandjean on fluoride December 21, 2014
• Did the Royal Society get it wrong about fluoridation? December 14, 2014
• “Do your own research!” December 11, 2014
• Cherry-picking and misinformation in Stan Litras’s anti-fluoride article December 8, 2014
• The farce of a “sciency” anti-fluoride report December 3, 2014
• Water fluoridation and dental fluorosis – debunking some myths November 24, 2014
• Declan Waugh pushes another anti-fluoride myth November 18, 2014
• Severe dental fluorosis the real cause of IQ deficits? November 16, 2014
• Declan Waugh claims it’s “clear as day” November 6, 2014
• Fluoridation – a racist conspiracy? October 22, 2014
• Fluoride debate: Second response to Rita Barnett-Rose – Daniel Ryan October 16, 2014
• Fluoride debate: Response to Daniel Ryan’s critique – Rita Bartlett-Rose October 15, 2014
• Fluoride debate: A response to Rita Barnett-Rose – Daniel Ryan October 14, 2014
• Fluoride debate: The scientific evidence against fluoridation – Rita F. Barnett October 13, 2014
• Another legal defeat for NZ anti-fluoridation activists October 9, 2014
• Anti-fluoridation propagandists promoting shonky “review” October 8, 2014
• Peer review of an anti-fluoride “peer review” September 29, 2014

• Activist’s anti-science adverts found misleading – again September 24, 2014
• Don’t you get tired of this? September 22, 2014
• It’s time we did something about sugar September 17, 2014
• Crude dredging of the scientific literature September 15, 2014
• Anti-fluoride activists define kangaroo court as “independent” September 12, 2014
• Do you prefer dental fluorosis or tooth decay? September 7, 2014
• Ingested fluoride, dental health and old age September 3, 2014
• Making money out of fanatics August 29, 2014
• Dirty politics on the Royal Society fluoride review August 27, 2014
• Review finds community water fluoridation safe and effective August 22, 2014
• Anti-fluoride activists unhappy about scientific research August 21, 2014
• Open letter to Jane Nielson – a “fluoridation convert.” August 13, 2014
• Natural News comes out with a load of heavy metal rubbish on fluoride August 3, 2014
• Declan Waugh continues his distortion of Finnish fluoride research July 31, 2014
• Another fluoridation whopper from Declan Waugh July 29, 2014
• I am still waiting for my cheque July 27, 2014
• An answer to the anti-fluoride critics – in one image July 24, 2014
• Elected officials must ignore activists and listen to own voters July 18, 2014
• The irony of some peer-review and citation complaints July 15, 2014
• Anti-science US Congressman on House science Committee! July 10, 2014

• “Creative” reporting of fluoridation science July 7, 2014
• What happens when fluoridation is stopped? July 3, 2014
• Controversial IQ study hammered in The Lancet June 30, 2014
• Fluoridation: what about reports it is ineffective? June 26, 2014
• Approaching scientific literature sensibly June 25, 2014
• Declan Waugh’s misinformation on fluorosilicic acid June 23, 2014
• An open letter to Declan Waugh – new mechanism for fluoride toxicity? June 17, 2014
• Toxicity is in the dose or concentration of fluoride June 15, 2014
• Councils and scientists targeted by anti-fluoride activists June 11, 2014
• Connett’s hypocrisy on fluoride & IQ June 4, 2014
• Confirmation blindness on the fluoride-IQ issue May 29, 2014
• Where do teeth come from? The stork theory May 27, 2014
• There is research and there is “research” May 22, 2014
• Fluoridating water does not lower IQ – New Zealand research May 19, 2014
• Fluoride and IQ – once more May 19, 2014
• Another anti-fluoride myth in the making May 15, 2014
• A balanced debate May 14, 2014
• Fluoridation: What a difference a year makes? May 11, 2014
• Wishart misrepresents fluoride science to advance his extreme ideology May 8, 2014
• Fluoridation: emotionally misrepresenting contamination May 5, 2014

• Peer review, shonky journals and misrepresenting fluoride science April 30, 2014
• Ingested fluoride is beneficial to dental health. April 27, 2014
• Anti-fluoridation advertising deceptive April 24, 2014
• Fluoridation: putting chemical contamination in context April 22, 2014
• Declan Waugh scaremongers over fluoride – again April 10, 2014
• Pandering to anti-fluoridation campaigners April 7, 2014
• Fluoridation returns to Hamilton City. March 27, 2014
• Dental fluorosis: badly misrepresented by FANNZ March 24, 2014
• Cherry-picking and ring-fencing the scientific literature March 17, 2014
• Fluoride and heart disease – another myth March 13, 2014
• Corporate backers of anti-fluoride movement lose in NZ High Court. March 9, 2014
• Fluoride and the 5 easy steps of a conspiracy theory March 4, 2014
• Pseudoscience in your supermarket February 26, 2014
• Repeating bad science on fluoride February 20, 2014
• Quality and selection counts in fluoride research February 16, 2014
• The precautionary principle February 12, 2014
• The fluoride debate – what do the experts say? February 5, 2014
• Download The Fluoride Debate January 28, 2014
• Fluoride debate: Final article – Ken Perrott January 23, 2014
• Fluoride debate: Paul Connett’s Closing statement January 22, 2014

• False balance and straw clutching on fluoridation January 14, 2014
• Who is funding anti-fluoridation High Court action? January 12, 2014
• Astro-turfing for scientific credibility January 9, 2014
• Fluoride debate: Ken Perrott’s closing response to Paul Connett? December 30, 2013
• Fluoride debate: Arguments Against Fluoridation Thread. Part 8. Paul December 25, 2013
• Fluoride debate: Response to Paul’s 5th article December 16, 2013
• Fluoride debate: Arguments Against Fluoridation Thread. Part 5. Paul December 12, 2013
• Fluoride debate: Response to Paul’s 6th article. December 9, 2013
• Fluoridation debate: Against Fluoridation Thread. Part 6. December 2, 2013
• Fluoridation debate: Why I support fluoridation – 2nd reply to Connett November 25, 2013
• Fluoride Debate: Why I support fluoridation – 2nd response from Connett November 21, 2013
• From dental neglect to child abuse? November 20, 2013
• Fluoride Debate: Why I support fluoridation – response to Connett November 17, 2013
• Fluoride debate: Why I support fluoridation – Response from Connett November 14, 2013
• Fluoride debate: Why I support fluoridation November 11, 2013
• Fluoride debate – I get email November 8, 2013
• Fluoride debate Part 1a – response to Connet’s response: Perrott November 7, 2013
• Fluoride debate – some housekeeping November 5, 2013
• Fluoride debate Part 1a – response: Connett November 4, 2013
• Fluoride debate Part 1: Perrott October 30, 2013

• Fluoride debate Part 1: Connett October 30, 2013
• The fluoride debate – introduction October 29, 2013
• Anti-fluoridation porkies – Mullinex’s rats October 22, 2013
• Fluoridation: Hangout with the University of Waikato October 13, 2013
• Cyber bullying of science October 5, 2013
• Fluoridation: the hip fracture deception October 3, 2013
• Anatomy of an anti-fluoridation myth September 24, 2013
• NZ experts deplore anti-fluoridation misrepresentation of science September 22, 2013
• Fluoridation – the IQ myth September 18, 2013
• When politicians and bureaucrats decide the science September 15, 2013
• Welcome counter to scientific and health misinformation September 13, 2013
• Dentists you can trust? September 5, 2013
• Activists peddle chemical misinformation for fluoridation referenda September 4, 2013
• Cherry picking fluoridation data August 29, 2013
• Anti-fluoridationist astro-turfing and media manipulation August 27, 2013
• Anti-fluoride activists attempt to silence science August 23, 2013
• Experts speak out on fluoridation August 21, 2013
• Fluoride sensitivity – all in the mind? August 18, 2013
• Anti-fluoridation study flawed – petition rejected August 14, 2013
• Hamilton – the water is the problem, not the fluoride! August 7, 2013

• Topical confusion persists August 5, 2013
• Water treatment chemicals – why pick on fluoride? July 28, 2013
• Is fluoridated water a medicine? July 18, 2013
• Debunking anti-fluoridation myths July 17, 2013
• Fluoridation – an organised campaign to misinform. July 14, 2013
• Hamilton gets its fluoridation referendum July 12, 2013
• Fluoridation – topical confusion July 10, 2013
• Fluoridation and conspiracy theories July 7, 2013
• Fluoridation – the violation of rights argument. July 3, 2013
• Poisoning the well with a caricature of science June 27, 2013
• Fluoridation petition – for Hamilton citizens June 26, 2013
• Fluoridation – it does reduce tooth decay June 20, 2013
• Getting a grip on the science behind claims about fluoridation June 17, 2013
• Is fluoride an essential dietary mineral? June 16, 2013
• Will Hamiltonians finally get a voice on fluoridation? June 13, 2013
• Scientists, political activism and the scientific ethos June 13, 2013
• Fluoridation – are we dumping toxic metals into our water supplies? June 11, 2013
• Tactics and common arguments of the anti-fluoridationists June 7, 2013
• Hamilton City Council reverses referendum fluoridation decision June 5, 2013