Search Results for: fluoride debate

Fluoride debate: Ken Perrott’s closing response to Paul Connett?

This is Ken Perrott’s response to Paul Connett’s last article Fluoride debate: Arguments Against Fluoridation Thread. Part 8. Paul. For Paul Connett’s original article see – Fluoride debate Part 1: Connett. This exchange is now winding down – despite the fact … Continue reading

Fluoride debate: Arguments Against Fluoridation Thread. Part 8. Paul

This is Paul Connett’s response to Ken Perrott’s last article Fluoride debate: Response to Paul’s 5th article For Paul Connett’s original article see – Fluoride debate Part 1: Connett. Ken’s response to my last posting once again is incomplete and … Continue reading

Fluoride debate: Response to Paul’s 5th article

This is Ken Perrott’s response to Paul Connett’s last article Fluoride debate: Arguments against fluoridation thread. Part 5. Paul. For Paul Connett’s original article see – Fluoride debate Part 1: Connett. Paul’s last article was another Gish gallop of arguments … Continue reading

Fluoride debate: Arguments Against Fluoridation Thread. Part 5. Paul

This is Paul Connett’s response to Ken Perrott’s last article  The fluoride debate: Response to Paul’s 6th article. For Paul Connett’s original article see – Fluoride debate Part 1: Connett. Here is my response to Ken’s last response to this thread … Continue reading

Fluoride debate: Response to Paul’s 6th article.

This is Ken Perrott’s response to Paul Connett’s last article Fluoridation debate: Against Fluoridation Thread. Part 6. For Paul Connett’s original article see – Fluoride debate Part 1: Connett. Discussion in comments section: The quality of the discussion in the … Continue reading

Fluoride Debate: Why I support fluoridation – 2nd response from Connett

This is Paul Connett’s second response to Ken Perrott’s original article – Fluoride debate: Why I support fluoridation In it he is responding to Ken’s article Fluoride Debate: Why I support fluoridation – response to Connett.  I am going to ignore most of … Continue reading

Fluoride Debate: Why I support fluoridation – response to Connett

This is Ken Perrott’s response to Paul Connett’s first criticisms of Ken’s article Fluoride debate: Why I support fluoridation – Response from Connett. For Ken Perrott’s original article see – Fluoride debate: Why I support fluoridation. First this issue of science … Continue reading

Fluoride debate: Why I support fluoridation – Response from Connett

This is Paul Connett’s response to Ken Perrott’s article – Fluoride debate: Why I support fluoridation. I think your opening statement certainly gives us a perspective from where you are coming on this issue Ken and that is helpful. I am … Continue reading

Fluoride debate: Why I support fluoridation

So far, our exchange has only covered some arguments against fluoridation and responses to those arguments. Some readers feel we should have started with me advancing the arguments for fluoridation. For example one commenter, Alison, said “readers haven’t had the … Continue reading

Fluoride debate – I get email

From time to time I get personal email from readers who are upset by articles. I don’t know why they bother – surely it would be more effective to put their arguments in the comments section which are read by others … Continue reading