Ken on The Putin diversion Ken on The Putin diversion David Fierstien on The Putin diversion Ken on The Putin diversion David Fierstien on The Putin diversion xavier on Repeating bad science on … soundhill1 on Dental health – it… soundhill1 on Dental health – it… soundhill1 on The Putin diversion Ken on The Putin diversion Ken on MH17 tragedy – 2 years… Ken on The Putin diversion Ken on The Putin diversion David Fierstien on The Putin diversion David Fierstien on The Putin diversion
- Dental health – it’s not all about fluoride
- The Putin diversion
- The insult of low expectations
- MH17 tragedy – 2 years on
- Misrepresenting fluoride science – an open letter to Paul Connett
- Are you really right?
- June ’16 – NZ blogs sitemeter ranking
- Why don’t feminists fight for Muslim women?
- Permission to have that conversation
- A cynical take on effective speakers
- A curious message from God
- Aspects of Computable Analysis
- Fuelling a greener economy
- Examining the ecological complexities of blackfoot paua demography and habitat requirements in the scope of marine reserve protection
- The mechanisms of cell invasion in cnidarian-dinoflagellate symbiosis: Learning from parasitic strategies
- The molecular forms of BMP15 in a range of mammalian species
- Maximality in the ⍺-C.A. Degrees
- Azulene-based Protecting Groups
- Earth science showcase set for Te Papa in mid-July
- New Vision Mātauranga projects for GNS Science
- The Ecological Impacts of Mining at Seafloor Massive Sulfide Deposits on Megafaunal Assemblage Structure and Population Connectivity
- Metamorphism of metachert from the Southern Alps, New Zealand. A thermodynamic forward modelling study
- Bacterial diversity and viral discovery in the invasive Argentine ant (Linepithema humile)
- Private finance and governance of REDD+ projects in Indonesia
- Investigating the Quantitative Trait Loci Contributing to Individual Variation in Drug Response
- The Role of the Serotonin Transporter as a Genetic Risk Factor in the Development of Drug Addiction
- "I just find it awkward": Girls' negotiations of sexualised pop music media
- Generalizing the Algebra of Throws to Rank-3 Matroids
- Geology and Geothermal Setting of Tompaso Geothermal System, Indonesia, with Comparisons of Andesite Alteration Patterns with Wairakei, New Zealand
- Topics in Algorithmic Randomness and Computability Theory
Articles and comments search
Add to Favourites
Tag Archives: Ayaan Hirsi AliImage
Here’s a nice video where Lisa Bu describes the importance of books in her development.
She talks about her cross-cultural experience and how books have helped here understand both her original culture and her new culture.
Her talk reminded me of Ayaan Hirsi Ali’s experience. She describes in her book Infidel how growing up in Somalia she managed to read some English books. Although these were basically crappy novels they did open her mind to another culture.
Even within a country and a culture books can do a lot to open children’s minds up to the possibilities of their future life. It is really sad that many homes do little to provide reading material for children. But even disadvantaged children can get access to books through their schools, library and helpful adults outside the family.
Books are important for kids.
Well, that’s how someone described them.
They have had a number of discussions recently, in a range of countries. Someone has now put these together in a single movie. Here’s the movie trailer. Looks interesting
By the way, the movie includes discussions with others too. here’s a description from the YouTube site:
‘The Unbelievers’ follows renowned scientists Richard Dawkins and Lawrence Krauss across the globe as they speak publicly about the importance of science and reason in the modern world – encouraging others to cast off antiquated religious and politically motivated approaches toward important current issues.
The film includes interviews with celebrities and other influential people who support the work of these controversial speakers, including:
I wasn’t going to write a eulogy to Christopher Hitchens, and I still won’t. After all there are some excellent eulogies on the internet by far better writers than me. But I am intrigued at the world-wide reaction to his death. So, in instead of a respectful eulogy here’s my thoughts on those reactions.
Hitchens’ death was expected. However, when it came I certainly experienced a shock. A strong feeling of disappointment and loss. And I think that must have been a common reaction judging from the widespread and immediate reactions on social networking sites.
There seem to be four common reactions to that sad news:
The organisers of the 2012 Global Atheist Convention in Melbourne have announced that tickets will go on sale from September 1st. If you are planning to go I recommend an early purchase as they did sell out quickly last time. And successful as the 2010 Convention was this one is shaping up to be even better.
Convention organisers are announcing confirmed speakers one at a time – The latest is Ayan Hirsi Ali who is certainly going to be a crowd drawer. She is one of my heroines.
Photos of the other speakers so far announced are below. Click on the individual photos to go to their details.
Book Review: Against All Gods: What’s Right and Wrong About the New Atheism by Phillip Johnson and John Mark Reynolds
Price: US$10.20; NZ$29.97
Paperback: 128 pages
Publisher: Intervarsity Press (May 2, 2010)
This book’s subtitle intrigued me – “What’s right and wrong about the new atheism.” Has Phillip Johnson, the “Godfather” of “intelligent design” and harsh critic of evolutionary science and “scientific materialism” got something positive to say about “new atheism?” Does he think people like his arch-enemy Richard Dawkins have something right?
Johnson claims in the book’s introduction: “our intention is not to attack the atheists but to explore the case they are making.” And: “the arguments for atheism should be taken seriously and considered both respectfully and critically.”
Now that would be a change, wouldn’t it? Many religious authors jumped on the bandwagon of analysing and criticising “new atheism’ after publication of the best-selling books by Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, Daniel Dennett, Christopher Hitchens, Victor Stenger and Ayaan Hirsi Ali in recent years. But their bias, personal attacks, straw clutching and straw mannery make most of them useless. Perhaps Phillip Johnson will break ranks and honestly elaborate on his philosophical differences with science and atheism instead? Perhaps he will admit the popularity of these books may be because they have identified some real problems?
The short film investigates violence against women in some Muslim societies. The script was written by Ayaan Hirsi Ali who was involved in social work amongst abused Muslim women in Europe.
After the film’s screening van Gogh and Hirsi Ali received death threats. On November 2, 2004, Van Gogh was murdered by Mohammed Bouyeri. Bouyeri shot him eight times, cut his throat, nearly decapitating him, and stabbed him in the chest. A five-page note threatening Western governments, Jews and Ayaan Hirsi Ali was attached to Van Gogh’s chest with a knife.
Since that time Ayaan Hirsi Ali has been under constant guard, and moved to the USA for some time. Bouyeri is currently serving a life sentence.
Ayaan Hirsi Ali wrote the book Infidel – I can highly recommend it. Brought up a Muslim she is now an atheist. Currently she is writing a fictional book where Mohamed is confronted by some well known Western enlightenment intellectuals. Should be good.
See also: Submission video
Book Review: The New Atheism: Taking a Stand for Science and Reason by Victor Stenger
This book is timely. The “New Atheism” hit our awareness in the mid-part of the decade when Sam Harris’s book “The End of Faith” became a best-seller. This was quickly followed by more best-sellers from the authors Daniel Dennett, Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens and Victor Stenger (the author of this book). And then there was the response. Many books have been written, mostly be theists, attacking the “New Atheists.” Although none of the later was a best-seller they did suggest that a new stage in the religion-atheism debate was underway.
Stenger’s new book is also useful because it helps put this whole debate in context. He summarises that nature of the “New Atheism movement” (although it is hardly a movement as there was no coordination in publishing these books). He briefly summarises the arguments of the “New Atheism” and the arguments employed by those attacking “New Atheism.” Then he shows the fallacies in the arguments employed by the “New Christians.” In some cases he reveals the way many of the “New Atheist” positions have been distorted and misrepresented. In others he deals with the substance of these arguments – particularly those dealing with scientific issues.
As an Emeritus Professor of Physics and Astronomy at the University of Hawaii and Adjunct Professor of Philosophy at the University of Colorado Stenger is an ideal person to write on this subject
Ayaan Hirsi Ali is one of my heroes. (Or should that be heroines? I don’t know what the terminology is these days). I recommend everyone to read her book Infidel. And certainly watch any videos where she is lecturing or being interviewed.
I watched Ayaan Hirsi Ali on the Viability of Hope recently. It’s excellent. She gives a brief description of her life experiences, her movement from Islam to atheism and her thoughts on the current problems presented by radical Islam and how to counter them.
The video is of an on-stage interview at American Jewish Council Conference (a situation interesting in itself).
I particularly liked her analysis of left/right politics.
And something to look forward to. She is currently working on a new book – a fictional discussion between Mohammed and several great western thinkers. The book should be out at the end of this year, or next year. I’ll definitely be on the lookout for that.
Scientific research is a very creative and personally satisfying process. However, researchers often find that the inevitable specialisation and concentration on limited aspects of reality can lead to a lack of understanding and appreciation of discoveries in other fields.
Since retirement I’ve appreciated the opportunity to read more widely. I find myself returning to subjects I haven’t considered for decades, or have neglected. I’m learning about the amazing discoveries humanity has made (behind my back) in the meantime.
I was encouraged to check out, and summarise, what I have been reading by the reading lists blogged by Damian and others. The number of books I have got through (in four years) shocked me – perhaps I’m a bit obsessive, or maybe its just the freedom retirement has given me.
I can recommend most books on the list – but definitely not every one (guess which).