Thanks to Jerry Coyne (Physics pwns creationism)
I think the cartoon perceptively indicates that sort of “research” done by “creation science.” Biblical stories are used for the answers then they only have to sort out which science they can distort to “prove” their answers. I guess that’s why we have websites like “Answers in Genesis.”
But here’s a new blog which demonstrates a “purpose” for this creation “research.” Its called Science Essentials and has the subtitle “Practical Resources for Teaching Creation-Based Science.”
The blog describes its aim as supporting a community of “parents, teachers, and administrators who desire to teach creation-based science.” And “is committed to providing relevant, practical resources to those who engage elementary and/or secondary students.”
The old story of evangelical and fundamentalist Christians attempting to get their religious myths taught in science courses.
These people never seem to give up. Which, unfortunately, places a demand on science and the supporters of science to be constantly wary of these attempts.
Posted in Christianity, creationism, evolution, faith, god, religion, SciBlogs, science, Science and Society
Tagged answers in genesis, Christianity, Creation Science, Genesis, god, Origins and Creation, SciBlogs
This term gets used a lot – but what does it mean?
In a recent discussion a local supporter (I think) of theistic evolution put it this way: Both “theistic evolutionists” and “atheistic evolutionists” accepts Darwinian evolution as true. Nevertheless – he describes these as two alternatives “theories.” But he admits: “the empirical evidence . . . will not provide reasons for one position over another. The two positions have to be decided then on other grounds.”
I think this person, and probably most other people who use the “theistic evolution,” label are confused. They are not talking about scientific theories. They are talking about their own religious beliefs. These “other grounds” are religion.
All these people are saying is: “I accept evolutionary science but I am still a theist.”
Posted in atheism, belief, Christianity, creationism, Darwin, Dembski, evolution, faith, god, intelligent design, religion, science, supernatural, superstition
Tagged Christianity, evolution, New Zealand, Origins and Creation, religion, Religion and Spirituality, theistic evolution