A debunking handbook provides lessons in science communication

Here’s a great new booklet that everyone interested in science communication should read – especially science bloggers. It’s the The Debunking Handbook by  John Cook, Global Change Institute, University of Queensland and Stephan Lewandowsky, School of Psychology, University of Western Australia.

While the booklet is aimed primarily at advising the best way to counter science denial and distortions the advise can be applied to any popular science communication. What’s more, the booklet itself is an example of excellent communication principles. It’s compact (only 8 pages), its message is upfront, its easy to understand and it’s illustrated.

Chris Mooney, who is an American science communicator, is also raving about the booklet. Here’s how he summarises the main messages:

“1. Don’t lead with the wrong view you’re trying to debunk, but rather, with the correct view you want to instill.

2. Don’t overload people with information. Be “lean, mean, and easy to read.”

3. Don’t attack worldviews—either find more persuadable audiences, or defuse deeply seated ideological resistance through practices like framing and self-affirmation, which reduce defensiveness. “Self affirmation and framing aren’t about manipulating people,” write Cook and Lewandowsky, “They give the facts a fighting chance.”

4. Don’t leave someone with nothing to believe—if you want to unseat a myth, you’d better provide a better real explanation in its place. “When you debunk a myth, you create a gap in the person’s mind,” reads the Handbook. “To be effective, your debunking must fill the gap.”

On top of these key points, there are a variety of more practical bits of advice like:

1. Use graphics to convey correct information. Especially graphics as good as the ones that Cook and Lewandowsky use.

2. Use sound bites. Your bottom line needs to be Tweet-able.

3. Sometimes, it is better to reduce the credibility of a source than to frontally attack its wrong claims.”

I recommend you download the booklet, read it and keep it on your desk. Especially if you blog about science, or do a lot of popular science communicating in your day job.

Thanks to Chris Mooney: The Science of Debiasing: The New “Debunking Handbook” Is a Treasure Trove For Defenders of Reason.

Similar articles

10 responses to “A debunking handbook provides lessons in science communication

  1. Yay! a monograph!

    Like

  2. Another Orwellian piece of writing from the Brisbane cartoonist who has made hit his life mission to become senior propagandist for the warmist cause.

    Personally, I’d rather eat a plate of hot dog shit than read anything penned by John Cook!

    Just a thought.

    Like

  3. oh yeah… great new booklet

    Like

  4. Sometimes, it is better to reduce the credibility of a source than to frontally attack its wrong claims.”

    Link them to “Big Oil”, or the tobacco industry. Compare them with creationists and flat earthers, etc etc.

    Great advice from the Goebbels of Australian “Science Communication”

    Like

  5. @Mick remember the #1 rule of civilized discussion: “First one to mention Nazis- loses.” Talking angry doesn’t make you right. try talking sense and making a sensible point rather than throwing around “dog shit”, “Big oil” and “Goebbels”. I’d like to understand a bit more than “Cook bad!”

    Like

  6. I didn’t mention Nazis you twat. You did

    Like

  7. Are you for serious man?
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Goebbels

    Like

  8. no comment editing option i see… oh well. skip the “for”.

    Like

  9. Goebbels was a Nazi.
    Honest.
    There are pictures available of him in his Nazi Uniform and everything.
    And um…,well, you did mention him.

    We all accept you are loosely tuned and all that but…seriously, think before you type.

    Like

  10. “Don’t overload people with information. Be “lean, mean, and easy to read.”
    i like this messages.

    Like

Leave a Reply: please be polite to other commenters & no ad hominems.