Climategate summed up

They say a picture can tell a story. I think this one is pretty good. Its by Nick Anderson, Houston Chronicle From the Cartoonist Group.

Thanks to Mind of Dan, Climategate: the scandal that wasn’t, Part 2

Permalink

Similar articles

Share

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Advertisements

9 responses to “Climategate summed up

  1. Barry Soetoro

    How could anyone deny the the tax fraud eugenics scam known as climate change. While the CO2 content in our atmosphere is measured at 0.03% science shows us this is a reduction over the Earths history from as high as 20%.

    Like

  2. That’s right Barry!
    It’s all a kospiracy.

    NASA is sekritly lying to you.
    All the world’s scientific communities are lying to you because…they’re all commies.
    Right?
    😉

    While the CO2 content in our atmosphere is measured at 0.03% science shows us this is a reduction over the Earths history from as high as 20%.

    So?
    What’s your point?
    Are you saying that because of this that global warming isn’t trooo?
    What do you know about all this that NASA does not?
    Do tell.
    🙂

    Like

  3. Barry, I take it you enjoyed the cartoon?

    Sent from my iPod

    Like

  4. Barry, when was atmospheric CO2 content at 20%?

    Like

  5. These GLOBAL/CLIMATE CHANGE humans are so arrogant that they think we humans have the POWER to destroy the Earth?? Sorry. We don’t. God made the Earth. HE can destroy it IF HE SO CHOOSES. Strange it’s been called GLOBAL WARMING until everything started cooling down, so now it’s called CLIMATE CHANGE. What a bunch of thieves/liars/thugs. WIND TURBINES BE DAMNED. SOLAR PANELS BE DAMNED. GENERAL ELECTRIC BE DAMNED (GE DOESN’T pay any taxes but they andALgore are making $MILLIONS). Wow, that’s fair isn’t it.

    Like

  6. Your god made the earth? When was that cdorse?

    Like

  7. Richard Christie

    Barry, when was atmospheric CO2 content at 20%?

    Andrew W, I believe evidence exists for very high CO2 levels in past if one accepts the snowball earth theory. I can’t recall exact figure though, see this series for estimates

    Barry is confused though, the high concentration is evidence for CO2’s role as global warming agent.

    Like

  8. Denialists like to talk about the very high atmospheric CO2 concentrations that have existed in the Earths history, they tend not however to mention that these very high concentrations occurred hundreds of millions to billions of years ago, before there was even any land life to speak of, and when the sun was significantly fainter than it is now.

    Like

  9. …GLOBAL/CLIMATE CHANGE blah, blah, POWER blah, blah, HE blah, blah, IF HE SO CHOOSES, blah, blah, GLOBAL WARMING, blah, blah, CLIMATE CHANGE. blah, blah, WIND TURBINES BE DAMNED. SOLAR PANELS BE DAMNED. GENERAL ELECTRIC BE DAMNED (GE DOESN’T, blah, blah, ALblah blah, blah, MILLIONS).

    cdorse is a very good example of a climate denier.
    Perfect really.
    A nutty, chewy blend of climate denialism and creationism.
    Funny how those two fields so often overlap.

    Creationists with thermometers.
    Their “thinking” works for biology…and climatology.
    How convenient.
    Preach the controversy, right?

    (The typing in ALLCAPS an added bonus.
    It’s not at all the sign of a crazy person or anything.)
    🙂

    Like

Leave a Reply: please be polite to other commenters & no ad hominems.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s