This cartoon reminded me of some of the local campaigners against fluoridation. They almost all are either strongly connected to the “natural” health movement and its businesses, or, because of their beliefs, are customers of that industry. Yet they often argue that genuine scientific and health experts are in the pay of “big pharma” or similar businesses and are acting as “shills” for industry! That is plain hypocrisy. Similar articles
- Follow Open Parachute on WordPress.com
Ken on Another shonky OPCW chemical i… Ken on Psychology of Russiagate… Ken on Psychology of Russiagate… Ken on Does international chemical wa… louisproyect on Another shonky OPCW chemical i… David Fierstien on Psychology of Russiagate… David Fierstien on Psychology of Russiagate… David Fierstien on Psychology of Russiagate… David Fierstien on Russiagate – Some insigh… reenmac on Does international chemical wa… Pat O'Dea on Does international chemical wa… Ken on Psychology of Russiagate… Ken on Psychology of Russiagate… lindarosarn on Psychology of Russiagate… reenmac on Psychology of Russiagate…
- Does international chemical watchdog cherry-pick evidence to confirm a bias?
- Psychology of Russiagate – an adult discussion for a change
- April ’19 – NZ blogs sitemeter ranking
- Russiagate – Some insights into its origins and results
- Russiagate: Lessons for the media. But will they listen?
- March ’19 – NZ blogs sitemeter ranking
- Aftermath of the Mueller report – the media starts looking at itself
- Mueller report to be released mid April – but it will be redacted
- Collapse of the “Russiagate ” myth exposes how corporate media has failed
- Getting out alive – why we should always demand evidence
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Articles and comments search
Add to Favourites