I reject any suggestion that one cannot be moral without religion.
You probably do too.
However, is that true for everyone? After all, individual variation within a species is a fact of life.
We shouldn’t assume other humans have the same relationship with morality that we have.
Maybe its a bit like erectile dysfunction in men. Most men have no problems. Others have arterial sclerosis or some other condition which interferes with normal functions. Fortunately there are medications like viagra which alleviate the condition and enable such men to have normal sex lives.
Daniel Dennett suggested that religion may be a sort of moral viagra (see atheist tapes). He suggested that if this is the case religion serves an important purpose for these people and he would not want to deny it to them.
An interesting thought.
However, if religion does serve this purpose for some people is belief in a god essential? Could a non-theist religion like Buddhism work just as well (or even better)?
And what about a non-religious moral and ethical philosophy? Would humanism be just as effective as a moral viagra?
New atheists or new anti-dogmatists?
Christian problems with morality
Religion and the “New Atheists”
Morals, values and the limits of science
Is religion the source of morality?
Crimes of Communism and Christianity
Religion and morality
Arguments against atheist morality